I think that is the first Farmall I have seen that has a row-crop front instead of a tricycle front. And I doubt if the bunny head was OEM. That is an impressive number of wheel weights mounted on the hub. If I remember correctly, I think each one is a hundred pounds because I was always amazed that my Grandpa could lift one by himself when they added the weights for plowing. I took a picture of the other side to see if it had weights. And to record the all important fact that this is a 1953 Super M. Note that it does not have as many weights on the right side. When a tractor pulled a plow, the right tire would be in the furrow that was left by the previous pass, and it would have good traction. But the left tire would be up on the hard, packed dirt that had not yet been plowed, and it would have trouble getting as good a grip. So the left tire would have more weight than the right tire. In this case it looks like 5 vs. 3 weights. I am more used to seeing 2 or 3 vs. 0 weights. I also note that it has the same small belt flywheel that was on the H in Naperville. Since I know an M has more horsepower than an H, my theory that the belt pulley size reflects the horsepower of the tractor is wrong. Looking at the rear we see it has a swing drawbar and a PTO. But it does not have 3-point hitch or hydraulic circuits.
Antique tractor collectors must also collect weights. Note in the first picture above that this tractor had 4 tire weights on the left tire as well. And this tractor has three front-end weights. The reason for the front-end weights was to prevent "wheelies." If the plow resisted being pulled, but the tires kept going forward because they retained traction due to the wheel weights, then the thing that "gave" is the front end would go up. So the front-end weights effectively increased the pulling power of the tractor by keeping the front end on the ground when the pulling got tough.
I circled back later when the WD-45 was "kid free" to take pictures of the rear. What struck me was that the steering wheel and seat are offset to the right. I'll have to keep an eye out for other WD-45s to see if this is the standard design. The engineers may have done that so that the transmission lever could go directly into the center of the transmission. I took a "high" picture to get a good look at all of the gauges etc. So it is not obvious if this design had a PTO. It does have a hydraulic circuit, but it is single-acting.


I finally have my very own picture of a John Deere putt-putt tractor. I zoomed in on the first picture above to get a view of the left side so that you can see the huge flywheel that a putt-putt needed because it had only two cylinders so the time between firings was long enough that you could distinctly hear each individual "putt". The big flywheel was needed to keep things going smoothly between "putts."
Note how much air is in the "engine compartment." I believe the shaft you can see going across the middle drives the radiator fan. You did not have to worry about replacing the fan belt in these units. When I was zooming on the right-side view looking to see if it had turning brakes (discussed below), I noticed the model letter is on the seat post. Later, I noticed a sign that indicated this is a 1940 Model A.
This Farmall 560 appears to be in original condition -- torn seat, a little rust on the bottom of the white trim, some dirt on the transmission case on the right side. But I think I prefer a realistic looking tractor to the typical gleaming restoration job. Note that this tractor is modern enough that it no longer has a belt pulley.


I do wish this tractor had a sign indicating the make, model, and year. I've never seen that arrangement for a steering wheel and shafts before.
And the sign on the front of the tractor is:
In a different part of the farm, they had three more Farmalls. See the captions for details. And I now see that the mystery tractor above with the weird steering wheel arrangement is a Model C.
1953 Farmall Super M |
1949 Farmall H |
1949 Farmall Super C |
And when I took the other side of the C, I included the old silos that were left on the farm.
No comments:
Post a Comment