"Plant Nameplate Capacity: 306.3 MW (Megawatts) Units and In-Service Dates: Unit 1: 75.0 MW (1953), Unit 2: 231.3 MW (1959)" This plant closed on Nov 1, 2019. In this case, it was Illinois rather than the EPA that forced the closure. In 2005, the owner agreed to an EPA settlement that "requires installation of four new flue gas desulfurization devices (scrubbers) to control SO2; four new baghouses to control particulate matter (soot); and operation of existing control equipment, including three selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, year-round to control NOx." [gem]
John Bogatitus posted Hennepin Power Station (when the lights were still on) Southeast corner looking towards #2 |
Calvin Newbaum posted, cropped Last drive out of Hennepin power station, December of ‘19. |
Once again, I save a satellite image because the coal pile and the loaded barges, if not the buildings, will be disappearing.
Satellite |
Brian Boers posted five photos with the comment: "Here’s an old plant I used to work at."
[Some comments indicate that the plant received the coal from Wyoming [PRB] using the rail-to-barge transloading at Havana.]
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 Nick Anderson: A double flow from both ends inward, two single flows. Straight condensing it looks like. Neat! |
5 |
David Todd commented on Brian's post Second plant I worked at, 11 years! |
EnergyCentral This plant was closed along with Coffeen, Duck Creek and Havana in order to allow four other plants in Illinois to keep running. (I read that some think some of these plants were cleaner than the some that were left running. But I lost the reference. Did Illinois allow the owner to close plants with more pollution controls because they were a bigger operations and maintenance headache?) |
martin-eng |
martin-eng "Air cannons are installed on the new chutes at Hennepin Power Station to prevent blockages." Even simple sounding stuff like coal chutes can cause problems if not designed properly. |
No comments:
Post a Comment